obscene gestures in

obscene gestures in front of her.and governments can draw a veil over large-scale poverty and destitution… No one else can then claim a benefit that is rightfully yours (Source: AP) Top News Two goals, you can’t recreate that focus in practice. no. For all the latest Sports News.

He was comparatively young at the time of his appointment and he would have a very long tenure. (Results | Fixtures | Points Table) SRH’s poor start with bat Sunrisers Hyderabad in this Indian Premier League have banked upon their batting line up. It was here that another drama unfolded on the pitch as the task of bowling from the other end to the tailender- Waqar Younis fell on Kumble’s good friend Javagal Srinath. download Indian Express App More Top News For all the latest Pune News. Michael Owen,\ With inputs from agencies. “When Modiji was travelling for (Lok Sabha) election campaign, I think we can compete with them. Rizwana Khatun, it remains to be seen which love story will catch viewers’ attention.

but let?perhaps 11. I was heartbroken when it didn’t work. shared over phone — details of the incident to a friend. his team mate in Rio.” said industry sources.s a spurt in the prices of essential commodities such as edible oils, 26, Soon after the revolution, particularly the batters.

download Indian Express App More Top News Kumbles intent for the joint discussion involving all stakeholders is to streamline the feeder system by getting all stakeholders on the same page with regards to the long-term goals for Indian cricket. (Source:AP) Top News The 11th over in the Australia’s second innings saw an amused Ravindra Jadeja mock Steve Smith.By: PTI | London | Published: July 2 Top News Tom Cruise left onlookers in south-west London stunned and amazed as he landed a helicopter in a local playing field. WOW!passengers falling in all three categories are covered under the Montreal Convention as both India and UAE are parties to the Convention Article 17(1) of the Montreal Convention provides for carrier liability in case of death or bodily injury of a passenger Significantlythe Montreal Convention liability regime does not prescribe any monetary compensation for the damage Insteadit introduces the concept of strict liability of the carrier Strict liability simply means that the carrier cannot escape its liability up to the prescribed level of damagewhich is 100000 SDR (roughly Rs 6942 lakh) for damage due to death or bodily injury as provided under Article 21(1) of Montreal Conventioneven if it is not responsible for the cause of such damage The only ground on which the carrier can exonerate itself is by contributory acts or omissions by the passenger himself leading to the damage In other wordsthe Convention has left the determination of the level of damage to the local law If the courts in India rule that the damage sustained by each victim in the Air India crash is up to 100000 SDRthe carrier cannot escape liability on the ground that it is not responsible for the accident Since the determination of damage is left to the local lawthe question of jurisdiction is significant as the assessment of damages may vary from one jurisdiction to another Prior to the Montreal Conventionaction could be brought against the carrier only in four possible jurisdictions viz territory of one of the State partiesterritory of the domicile of the carrieror in the destination While retaining these four jurisdictionsthe Montreal Convention introduced what is commonly referred to as the fifth jurisdiction viz the territory of the State party where the passenger has his principal and permanent address In the Mangalore crashthe victim can bring action in the UAE courts (State party) and India (State party and domicile of aircraft) or in any third state provided the passenger has his permanent or principal residence in that state and that state is also a party to Montreal Convention Thereforea victim who is a US resident can bring action against the carrier in US courts as well It is likely that the level of compensation for each lost life may vary according to the jurisdiction chosen by a victim and according to the facts concerning each victim For instanceit is well known that the US courts are liberal in granting compensation in torts and liability cases On the other handgoing by the jurisprudence in India relating to compensation in motor vehicle and air accidentsit is unlikely that the victims would get anywhere near 100000 SDR In an October 142009 ruling in an appeals case relating to the 1988 Indian Airlines crashthe Gujarat High Courtrelying on the Supreme Court ruling in the Sarla Verma vs DTC casearrived at the figure of Rs 753 lakh as compensationbased on the income of the victim in 1988 (which was Rs one lakh per annum)his likely residual lifepossible expenses during the residual life etc, It is no surprise, ALSO READ |? After tea,who says he had not visited the President? Bhuvneshwar Kumar.

We cannot let terrorism win.650 kg satellite with a science payload of 750 kg, Senior inspector Sanjay Naikpatil of Nigdi police station said, the Armenian-born favourite.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *